Site Logo
Looking for girlfriend > Looking for boyfriend > A man shall not have long hair

A man shall not have long hair

Account Options Login. The holy Bible, with a comm. Halaman terpilih Halaman Judul. Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua The holy Bible, with a comm. Clarke Adam Clarke Tampilan utuh -

SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: What NOT To Do When Growing Your Hair

Content:
SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: How to Grow Long Hair

Did Jesus Have Long Hair?

Then he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. Is it a shame for a man to have long hair? If so, who considers it a shame, and why is it considered a shame?

The answer to these questions and others are necessary to determine whether men may or may not wear long hair today. We must also define what is considered long and what is considered short. Finally any view on the subject must explain why God instituted the Nazarite vow Numbers 6.

The very fact that God commanded the Nazarite not to cut his hair suggests that men in general cut their hair. Long hair was the exception. Men did grow their facial hair however 2 Sam. For some reason Jesus is perceived to have long flowing hair. It is unclear how that perception arose, but it is possibly due to an obfuscation of the terms Nazarene and Nazarite. A Nazarite was the one with long hair e. Samson, Samuel. Jesus was a Nazarene, one who came from Nazareth. This is how nature deems it a shame for men to have long hair.

This is the meaning of nature. I cannot begin to detail how many things are wrong with that interpretation. It is a matter of choice not nature. It is the result of the fall. Thirdly the above interpretation does not take into account the Nazarite vow.

Most people superficially pass off the Nazarite vow as an exception to the rule. Anything that does not fit into their predetermined system of beliefs is an exception. That is very superficial and intellectually dishonest. Another possible definition of nature is the nature of God.

But it is very clear from reading the Bible, and from common sense, that God does not consider it a shame for men to have long hair. Otherwise He would have never instituted the Nazarite vow. If the very nature of God dictated that it were shameful for men to have long hair, then there can be no exception. For example, the nature of God dictates that adultery is a sin, therefore there can be no exception.

There are no circumstances under which adultery is ever excusable or tolerable to God. If God, because of his nature, hated long hair on men, then he also hated long hair on Samson.

Samson was a Nazarite who killed Philistines with the jawbone of an ass Judges A Nazarite was not supposed to come in contact with anything dead Numbers Samson did not even lose God's favor then. Only when he cut his hair. Also from a common sense perspective, God is more interested in the state of our hearts than our physical appearance. In order to understand the meaning of nature, we need to look at the flow of thought in 1 Cor Paul was conducting a discourse on women and head coverings.

Note that many believers still believe it is a shame for a man to have long hair despite the fact that women in their church do not cover their heads. I also do not believe the head covering command applies today , but at least I am consistent in my belief system. Paul was explaining why women in the church, in his day, should cover their heads when they prayed or prophesied.

Note that a physical head covering was intended here. Some people select one verse 1 Cor. This is based on a misunderstanding of the structure of the chapter and a reluctance to give the Bible any serious study.

This is how those verses would read:. Every woman who prays or prophesies while bald headed dishonors her head because it is just as if she were bald. If a woman is bald, let her be bald. And why must the covering only be on specifically when she prayed or prophesied? Could she be bald one minute, suddenly have long hair when she prays, then bald again when she says amen?

These verses only make sense if a physical head covering is intended. This was not because of any natural biological process, but just the social practice of the time.

In fact it is believed that only prostitutes deviated from that norm. That is why men with long hair and women with short hair or bald were associated with prostitution. The analogy Paul was driving at was this. This is where the issue of men having long hair entered the fray. The nature Paul referred to was the secular customs of the time.

Paul was trying to get the believers to adhere to the social customs of their times to avoid creating stumbling blocks to others. Every other command falls under those two main headings. There are many commands in the Bible which were temporal. Even God instituted a law concerning divorce, but He never intended it to be permanent. Jesus explained the reason why God gave that law, and he amended it. That did not contradict the initial law God gave, it simply recognized that the OT divorce law was only for a time.

Culture never remains constant. In ancient Corinth, Paul discouraged men from having long hair in keeping with the second greatest command — love your neighbor as yourself. The sight of men with long hair would definitely have been an offence to other believers.

The same is not true today. Long hair is no longer associated with male prostitution or any pagan activity. As a result, social nature no longer considers it a shame for a man to have long hair. Some may argue that it does offend people when a male believer has long hair. The Biblical definition of offence is different from our modern definition of the word. In the Bible, an offence is a stumbling block placed in the way of a new believer that causes him or her to stop following Christ.

There are those who have no intention of following Christ but are just looking for faults e. Jesus had no problem offending them. Then there are those who are just petty. They are flimsy and get offended modern definition for everything. It may require tact to deal with such people, but this is not the Biblical definition of offence. Then there is the third category of offended people — those who genuinely want to follow Christ but abandon their faith when they see men in church with long hair.

How many people actually fit the last category? Very little if any. Why is that? No one today could ever see a man in church with long hair and arrive at the conclusion that the church is encouraging male prostitution - "Let me stay far away from this". If per chance, there are some weak genuine Christians who stumble because they see a strong Christian man with long hair, then it is incumbent on the strong Christian to cut his hair. This scripture encourages gender distinction regarding our physical appearances.

It is unclear what the reasons were for God giving this command, possibly to differentiate Israel from the pagan nations. There may have been other reasons. Essentially men must look like men and women must look like women. Some churches take a hard line interpretation of this scripture and prohibit women from wearing pants. In Biblical times men wore what looked like skirts. They did not wear Levi's. The major apparent distinction, I think, between men and women was facial hair.

It is also reported that women in China wore pants long before it became the customary attire for men in the western world. Tying this scripture into our previous discussion, even if a man is to have long hair, he must avoid looking like a woman. However this is not really a problem since the hairstyles that men with long hair wear are different from those which women do. Again this is hardly ever the case.

Back in the time of Paul, society social nature considered it a shame for men to have long hair and for women to be bald. Modern society does not. Adhering to the social norms of their time was a form of keeping the second greatest commandment.

Those social norms have changed. Therefore it can be concluded that men may wear long hair if they so desire, as long as they avoid looking like women and vice versa. More people are watching LOJSociety videos and learning more than ever but since we don't apply advertise revenues across our media outlets we need your support.

BibleGateway

Read More Acts - And Paul [after this] tarried [there] yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; having shorn [his] head in Cenchrea: for he had a vow. Ezekiel - Neither shall they shave their heads, nor suffer their locks to grow long; they shall only poll their heads. Deuteronomy - The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so [are] abomination unto the LORD thy God. Leviticus - Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard.

You might have noticed how the world we live in has become very ungodlgy. Sin is considered the norm.

Why is cloning wrong? Does the Bible say a divorced person can remarry? Can angels sin? Is body piercing wrong?

King James Bible

Then he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. Is it a shame for a man to have long hair? If so, who considers it a shame, and why is it considered a shame? The answer to these questions and others are necessary to determine whether men may or may not wear long hair today. We must also define what is considered long and what is considered short. Finally any view on the subject must explain why God instituted the Nazarite vow Numbers 6. Before we discuss what nature means, it must first be said that men having long hair was not the norm in Biblical times. The very fact that God commanded the Nazarite not to cut his hair suggests that men in general cut their hair. Long hair was the exception.

Is it a shame for men to have long hair (1 Corinthians 11)?

Start free trial. All rights reserved worldwide. You'll get this book and many others when you join Bible Gateway Plus. Learn more.

Does not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame to him? King James Bible Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

That is the question. If the Bible is silent or non-committal on the subject, then we may be so too. The Bible most certainly does have something to say about the length of hair for males and females. The most significant passage of Scripture to deal with the topic is found in the New Testament, in 1 Corinthians

Is it a shame for men to have long hair?

It is false assumptions and misinformation that lead to false conclusions. This book will point out many of the false religious assumptions people frequently make which keep them from finding the path to true eternal life with God. Several mysteries of God are unfolded in this book which will bring people to a greater knowledge of God and his works among mankind.

Account Options Login. Koleksiku Bantuan Penelusuran Buku Lanjutan. Dapatkan buku cetak. Belanja Buku di Google Play Jelajahi eBookstore terbesar di dunia dan baca lewat web, tablet, ponsel, atau ereader mulai hari ini. What Is Wrong With the Bible?

Long hair for women and short hair for men

What does the Bible say about? But if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering. They shall not shave their heads or let their locks grow long; they shall surely trim the hair of their heads. After this, Paul stayed many days longer and then took leave of the brothers and set sail for Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila. At Cenchreae he had cut his hair, for he was under a vow. And when he cut the hair of his head for at the end of every year he used to cut it; when it was heavy on him, he cut it , he weighed the hair of his head, two hundred shekels by the king's weight. Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory?

Nazarites, by vow, wore long hair; therefore those who were not tied by that vow, shall not be so great and dangerous that you shall have occasion to shave your Doth not even custom teach you, that if a man have long hair, it is a shame to  - ‎Bible.

Then he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. Is it a shame for a man to have long hair? If so, who considers it a shame, and why is it considered a shame? The answer to these questions and others are necessary to determine whether men may or may not wear long hair today. We must also define what is considered long and what is considered short.

Q: Is it wrong for a man to have long hair? A: The one verse in the Bible that is primarily used for saying that it is wrong for a man to have long hair is 1 Cor which says, "Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? The first is cultural.

.

.

.

.

.

Comments: 3
  1. Visar

    It is remarkable, very valuable idea

  2. Zulusida

    Likely yes

  3. Moogugis

    In it something is. I will know, I thank for the information.

Thanks! Your comment will appear after verification.
Add a comment

© 2020 Online - Advisor on specific issues.